Did you know that you can translate what your staff does into how the company makes money? This can be done for any company in any line of business. This is called a profitability algorithm that converts staff productivity and efficiency values into sales and margin. With this in hand one only can subtract fixed cost and they can arrive at the company’s bottom line profit.
This information enables the company to focus in on which areas are performing well and which need improvement. Thus instead of trying to work everything, or guess where the problem is, one can zero in on those specific items where improvement is needed. In some cases there maybe tradeoffs that are needed to maximize results, such as sacrificing higher bill rates to get more volume, or reducing margin rates to get more order and a higher fill ratio. In all cases the idea is not to increase one item be it bill rates or margin rates, but rather to maximize margin $ and overall profit.
For example if a sales rep has 200 sales conversations a week that would be a productivity number, if out of those conversations they got 20 job orders that would be an efficiency value of 0.10, in turn if 4 of those orders resulted in a sale, that would be a 0.40 fill ratio. If those orders generated $200 each and the margin rate on those orders was 33%, then that sales person would generate $800 in sales and $264 in margin per week, or $1,056 in 4 week month. If there were 10 sales reps this would generate $10,560 in margin on sales of $32,000. If the company’s fixed cost was $9,000 this would result in a profit of $1,560 and a return on sales of some 5%.
With this information one can figure out the best structure an individual deal, create a profit plan that can explore the best option, set up a win-win commission plan for their rep, etc. Let’s take the example above. For example if sales calls increased by 5% and all other things remained constant, profit would increase to $2,616 from $1,560 or $1,056 or more then doubling profit. Alternatively, one could work on trade offs. If margins were reduced by 3% to become more competitive and fill ratios rose by 10% they would generate $3,400 in monthly profits vs. $1,560 or an increase of $1,840 or again increasing profits over 2 fold. This same concept could be applied to most any job function or process, designing a unique algorithm.
To see all articles in this series please go to http://optimal-mgt.com/blog.
Do you accept the proposition that all business is not necessarily good business? Do you so aggressively pursue new orders that you are not able walk away from a bad deal? If you sweep the streets you will invariable take orders your competitors did not want. In rare instances companies pursuing a predatory pricing strategy where they attempt to put competitors out of business, but if you are indeed a small to mid sized company this not a game that you should think about playing.
So let’s consider what might drive a company to go after all the business out there. They might want to grow which is a good idea, but taking business at a minimal or no profit is not the way to go unless for example you have lots of capital to finance your way to the point where you can make money this way, such as amortizing your fixed cost over a larger sale base or using LOSS LEADERS to penetrate a client and then increase your bill rate and margin rate.
If you don’t have such a MARKETING STRATEGY and are able to track your performance to make sure you are getting where you need to be, then exercise a more disciplined marketing approach. This would include determining: 1. Which jobs you can make money at given your current costs. 2. Which book of business you can negotiate a higher price at and only taking those. 3. Lowering your cost so that you can make a profit at the pricing levels you need to meet.
When you don’t have a well thought out and effective LOSS LEADER program, or can exercise one of these 3 MARKETING STRATEGIES to make money; then be prepared to walk away from this business. Many clients will try to find a vendor foolish enough to take business at a loss because they either do not know their cost, are desperate enough to take any business even if it is unprofitable to keep their staff busy, simply want to have a “big name” client on their books somehow hoping that the cache will bring in more profitable clients, etc. There competitors who can make money on business that you can’t do to their lower cost structure or other differences. Try negotiating a fair price before walking away from a bad deal. But when you can’t the best decision and looking for business that you can make a fair profit on. Know thyself and make your choices accordingly.
To see all articles in this series please go to http://optimal-mgt.com/blog.
Optimal Management has served the staffing industry since 1994 and has been a member of NACCB, CSP, ASA and NTSA. Our President, Michael Neidle has been in the staffing industry since 1989, including a senior executive for 2 large national staffing companies, starts-ups and Fortune 500 Corporations in the IT, biotech, service, and manufacturing sectors and is a noted speaker and author. Optimal Management was selected for the 2012 Best of San Mateo Award in the Business Management Consultants category. [More]